Mr. Liddle's English 103-Home

Last Minute Checklist for Multimodal Videos:

·         All videos uploaded on youtube

·         All videos given a similar name in order to create continuity

·         All links work, and go to the chosen video

·         All sound and video is well edited, and any glitches are explained in the process paper

·         Some kind of slide to let the viewer know they have reached the end of the video, and that gives them the opportunity to circle back to the beginning and “try again”

·         Make sure that the invisible youtube buttons line up with the buttons in your video.

·         All videos OTHER THAN THE FIRST VIDEO are marked as “unlisted” so that people don’t just walk randomly through the different possibilities

Possible Splits for Process Paper:

1.       Overview of the brainstorming process

2.       Video shooting process

3.       Editing Process

4.       Final word on the arguments that the video makes or fails to make

_________________________

1.       Overview of who did what in the group and how they were chosen

2.       The Initial goal of how the video was supposed to be

3.       How the final video ended up

4.       What the group would have done if they had more time/resources

__________________________

1.       Section on the hardest working person in the group that held everything together

2.       Easiest or most fun part of filming and how it reflects on the video

3.       Hardest or most frustrating part of filming and how it is reflected in your video

4.       Overview of the arguments that the video makes effectively, and how it comes up short. 

Hey guys, here are the two links:

For the guy who doesn’t want his camping site to be confused with the horrible accident:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/03/algorithms-can-have-errors-one-mans-quest-to-purge-horrific-pictures-from-his-google-results.ars

For the argument about special restraints on the algorithm:  

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2012/01/anti_vaccine_activists_9_11_deniers_and_google_s_social_search_.html

Read it

http://www.wired.com/vanish/ 

 

• Summarize: The first step to your annotation is to summarize the source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? What kind of evidence does the source use?
• Assess: After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source?
• Reflect: Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic?